From AI to outdated contracts: the legal risks agencies are overlooking in 2026

Robert Nay - LegalVision

As agencies navigate tighter margins, rising client expectations and rapid technological change, legal risk is increasingly emerging from day-to-day operations rather than major disputes. In this thought-leadership piece, Robert Nay, Co-Head of Legal at commercial law firm LegalVision, explores the most common legal risks agencies are overlooking in 2026, from outdated contracts and freelancer arrangements to AI adoption, and explains how stronger legal foundations can help agencies protect profitability and scale with confidence.

Our lawyers speak to our marketing, media and creative agency clients regularly, and unsurprisingly, the pain points and challenges are similar. 

Margins are tightening, client expectations are rising, and competition is intensifying – especially in the North, where agencies are typically smaller and not as well-resourced as counterparts in London. At the same time, the legal landscape is becoming more complex, particularly with the rapid adoption of AI, evolving privacy and employment laws.

For many agencies, legal risk is not coming from headline disputes. It is creeping in through everyday operations, often stemming from poor contract management and unclear intellectual property ownership.

Here are the key legal risks agencies should be paying attention to in 2026.

1. Outdated client contracts that no longer reflect reality

Agency services have evolved quickly in recent years, particularly with the integration of AI tools and hybrid service models. However, many agencies are still relying on legacy terms that were drafted years ago.

Common issues include:

  • No provisions covering AI-generated content or tools
  • Weak limitations of liability and exclusions from liability
  • Vague scope definitions that create exposure to scope creep
    Poorly structured payment terms
  • Missing intellectual property protections
  • GDPR obligations are not being considered or properly documented

As procurement teams become more sophisticated, agencies without robust contracts are increasingly vulnerable to risk being pushed onto them. Not having up-to-date terms is also unprofessional from an optics perspective.

A modern, commercially-balanced master services agreement, or similar, is one of the most effective ways to protect margins.

2. Intellectual property ownership confusion

Ownership disputes remain one of the most common sources of agency conflict.

Problems typically arise where:

  • Freelancers or contractors create deliverables without proper IP assignment clauses
  • Third-party AI tools are used
  • Agencies reuse assets across clients without permission
  • Clients assume they own the underlying creative processes or know-how

Without clear contractual wording, agencies can unintentionally lose ownership of valuable intellectual property or face infringement claims.

In a competitive market, protecting proprietary methodologies and assets is becoming increasingly important.

3. Freelancer and contractor misclassification

Many agencies rely heavily on freelancers to maintain flexibility. However, UK employment enforcement is tightening, and misclassification risk is rising.

Warning signs include:

  • Freelancers working fixed hours under supervision
  • Long-term exclusive engagements
  • Contractors being well integrated into internal teams
  • Lack of genuine business independence

If a contractor is deemed to be an employee, agencies can face claims for holiday pay, tax liabilities and employment rights.

Agencies should also ensure they are considering IR35 considerations where they are engaging workers who operate through personal services companies.

With ongoing regulatory scrutiny in the gig economy, this is an area agencies cannot afford to ignore.

4. Scope creep and informal changes

Scope creep is not just a commercial issue. It is also a legal one.

Agencies often agree to additional work informally, particularly in long-term client relationships. Over time, this creates:

  • Disputes about deliverables
  • Unpaid work
  • Unrealistic client expectations
  • Liability for outcomes never properly agreed upon
  • Potential for gap risk between client contracts and agreements with freelancers

Clear descriptions of the scope of services/deliverables, variation provisions in contracts, combined with disciplined project management, significantly reduce this risk.

5. Liability exposure in performance-based work

As agencies move into performance marketing, data-driven campaigns and revenue-linked models, liability is increasing.

Clients may attempt to hold agencies responsible for:

  • Campaign underperformance
  • Data inaccuracies
  • Overeliance on AI
  • Platform outages
  • Algorithm changes outside of an agency’s reasonable control

Without carefully drafted exclusion to liability clauses and disclaimers, agencies can find themselves exposed to claims far exceeding project value.

6. AI adoption without legal guardrails

AI is transforming the agency sector, but many businesses are adopting tools faster than governance frameworks can keep up.

Key risks include:

  • Using AI-generated content that infringes third-party rights
  • Confidential client information being uploaded into AI tools
  • Personal data being uploaded into AI tools
  • Lack of transparency about AI use
  • Unclear ownership of outputs
  • Regulatory compliance issues

Clients are increasingly asking agencies about AI usage policies during procurement processes. Agencies without clear policies may struggle to win work.

7. Employment law changes and workforce management

Workforce laws continue to evolve, including around zero-hour contracts and employee rights.

Common agency risks include:

  • Poorly documented (or outdated) staff handbooks make performance management more challenging
  • Inconsistent enforcement of hybrid working policies
  • Restrictive covenants
  • Incorrect assessments of contractors/workers/employees

As talent remains competitive in the Northern market, employment disputes can be costly both financially and reputationally.

8. Late payments and cash flow pressure

Payment risk is increasing in a worsening economic climate, as clients push for longer payment terms or dispute invoices more frequently.

Agencies should ensure:

  • Clear milestone-based payment structures
  • Strong late payment provisions (including a right to charge interest and to recover debt recovery costs)
  • Rights to suspend services for non-payment
  • Retention of IP ownership until payment in full is received

Well-structured payment terms are essential for protecting cash flow and reducing disputes.

Looking ahead

The agencies that thrive in 2026 will not necessarily be those taking the biggest risks, but those managing risk most intelligently.

Commercially minded legal advice is increasingly becoming part of commercial strategy. Strong contracts, clear policies and proactive risk management enable agencies to scale with confidence, protect margins and build stronger client relationships.

For growing agencies across the North, investing in the right legal foundations is no longer optional. It is a competitive advantage.

LegalVision is a commercial law firm supporting businesses with ongoing legal needs through a fixed-fee membership model. Its lawyers advise agencies, technology companies and high-growth businesses across the UK on contracts, employment, intellectual property and regulatory matters.

Related News